RSS Feed

a playground of art, photos, videos, writing, music, life


You are here

Random Quote

Writing is an occupation in which you have to keep proving your talent to those who have none.
-- Jules Renard


Blog - Blog Archive by Month - Blog Archive by Tag - Search Blog and Comments

<-- Go to Previous Page

How to Get People Excited to Give You $4 Million


Why is it that the obscure and hyperventilated Ron Paul can raise $4 million in a day, but the most likely guys to win the nomination - Mitt and Rudy - can't? Plus, Mitt's spending a beejesus to get funds raised; Ron Paul spends nothing. I'm sure that the businessman in Mitt has respect for the efficiency of Ron's money machine.

I looked over Ron's ideas and plans, believing that therein lie the core of his attraction to folks.

That's part of it.

How did Ron outraise Mitt and Rudy in a day and spend nothing to do it? Why did it work?

In other words, what are they doing wrong?

Mitt's web site is easy to find; it's his name - That shows some vision.

Rudy's? Not so much. It's the unintuitive The simpler is taken by someone hoping to make a buck off it, and Rudy's too cheap to buy it.

Once you get to either site, you can browse their issues and plans like I did .

Mitt's issues are here.

At a glance, what do you learn about the governor? Not much. Now, you can click into each issue and learn more, but holy smokes is it hard to find the bullet points version.

Rudy's issues are here.

I really don't like videos that automatically start playing when I visit a site. Rudy's issues page does that. It's annoying.

And while he has more text on his issues and plans than Mitt, it's all basically a recap of his time as mayor of New York City. He's gotten criticism for doing that in debates, and he's backed off that tactic. His web site, unfortunately, carries it on. But maybe that doesn't matter because maybe nobody's visiting his web site...

Ron Paul's web site does a good job of listing out his issues and plans.

And if I click on the link to learn more, I get a concise explanation of his position and his plan. In a brief 30 minutes, I know the guy.

With Mitt, I need a few hours or days, and frankly, nothing is really clear. His links to learn more about each issue are nothing more than a coupe of blurbs and a video per issue. Looks pretty, but it's hollow and flat. There are links that provide more substance, but they're not intuitive and they're a thick read when you do get to them.

With Rudy, his links to learn more are mostly videos... and it's just him talking. Big deal.

As a blogger, I devoted a lot of space to Ron Paul because I could - he made it easy for me to do that. The post I did on Ron's positions - I can't do that for Rudy or Mitt. They don't make it easy for me at all.

Which makes them personality candidates, and that's a problem.

The second thing is that Ron Paul has outsourced the marketing for his campaign to a very passionate group: his supporters.

One guy created a sign that read "GOOGLE RON PAUL" and erected it to be read by a lot of New York City.

Another supporter takes off her clothes on YouTube to promote Ron Paul.

His people are as much the campaign as Dr. Paul.

"The organization of the campaign popped up spontaneously on the Internet with these meet-up groups," Paul said in a recent interview with ABC News. "It's natural that they would donate the money. So in many ways the campaign has found me as much as I have found them. It's not a top-down organization. Its sort of bottom up. All we have done at the campaign is provide the message and the message turns out to be popular."
Said another way: it's not what Ron can do for them, but what they're doing through Ron. That's not true for Mitt or Rudy. Rudy's just being his prosecutorially verbal self and Mitt comes off like a 62-page corporate report fresh from Kinko's.

For the "What will you do and how will you do it?" crowd, Ron gives them an easily-digested answer.

Unless Mitt and Rudy figure out how to do some of the same, Ron might surprise them. Ron's campaign feels like his message: "We the People," a statement that is definitely true of him and his supporters.


Tags: politics
by Brett Rogers, 11/8/2007 11:28:31 AM


So Brett, as you learn more, do you find yourself leaning towards Paul? I tell ya, if he would use some common sense on foreign policy and get control of his emotions in debates I might have to eat a nice bowl of crow while sitting in a room alone with the "idiots" sound clip playing over and over.



Posted by Pale Rider, 11/8/2007 1:38:29 PM

You know, buddy, I don't find myself leaning toward Paul so much as I find myself deeply disappointed in Rudy and Mitt. Maybe I expect too much, but I think that people who want to run for president should have considered their principles, established their goals, and firmly laid out a strategy to achieve those goals, if elected. I don't read that in Mitt's and Rudy's web sites. What I do hear is this:

"I've been successful. Vote for me."

Yeah. Okay. Ho hum. History is a great guide to tell us that past success is never an indicator of future success. And I'm a firm believer that success can be just as dangerous as failure, especially in someone so powerful as the president of the US.

Ron Paul has an easily understood and singular principle - does it meet the standard of the US Constitution? - and from there, you can ascertain what his decisions will be. If his interpretation of the US Consititution is not unpalatable to you, then you might agree with him.

I think it takes both a leader with vision with a good measure of charisma and communication skills and a clear plan and the right reasons behind the plan to make a good president.

Rudy and Mitt both have the leader part down pretty good. I don't have any clarity or certainty about their plans.

I'm totally clear on Ron's plan - enough that I clearly know what I like and what I don't like - but his charisma is best defined as a clanging fire alarm. You can't ignore him, and you appreciate the warning, but he hurts the hell out of your ears.

Like I said previously: Ron Paul is "presidentially unelectable." I appreciate his push toward the right and his aggressive acceptance that he's just the horse that his supporters ride on. Mitt and Rudy are clueless, it feels to me, that they - the more presentable and electable candidates - have no clue how to market in the way that Ron does. That's a shame.



Posted by Brett Rogers (, 11/8/2007 3:01:24 PM

I just LOVE the clanging fire alarm comparison. So true, and so so funny.



Posted by Pale Rider, 11/9/2007 10:04:31 AM

Add Your Comment:
Name (required):
Web Site:
Remember Me:   
Content: (4000 chars remaining)
To prevent spammers from commenting, please give a one-word answer to the following trivia question:

What's the first name of the tiger who pitches Frosted Flakes?